Saturday, 16 December 2017

Some pre-year end musings

Blimey Charlies, half way through December. My Christmas list is done and sent off to Santy but there are no toy soldiers on it this year.

I'm sort of at a half way house or something at the moment. I've got a couple of small projects underway but I'm not working on anything that's really new to take to COW. Okay, so I've been fiddling with the "Taiping era" rules, but that's it.

The Taiping project is at a funny point. I got back into it because I fancied doing the French for the 1860 Opium War. This hit the bumpers in spectacular fashion (much as a painting project can be spectacular) as I recounted in the post from late June. The momentum has been partially salvaged by the purchase and construction of the two most recent wooden Chinese buildings, and the accompanying painting project. However I haven't recommitted my cash to replacing the Lancashire figures, and the wind has gone out of those particular sails. I'm also acutely aware that what I really need are a lot more Taipings, and I can't get motivated for that. It's just a chore painting figures just because I need them some time. And it is nagging at me that I should finish the Lancashire French and then buy them some European opponents.

The painting table at the moment has a few projects limping along. I'm still working my way through the bounty from the Hereward show. The pressure here is the commitment I gave to run a game at the Society of Ancients Battle Day. I really want to be sure I've got no ringers in the ranks, so I've painted another 4 or 5 phalangite units, and I've got another 3 that I need as a minimum to avoid having some hoplites or Carthaginians filling up the line. Alas I actually need another box of Macedonian Phalangites to get that done properly as I'd rather not use any figures that have the pikes levelled as they're just a nuisance once units hit each other. I've also been topping up my Macedonian Cavalry with another three units of them done and two more in the pipeline. And some light cavalry from the Persian boxes wouldn't go amiss. Oh, and I think my Persian medium cavalry needs strengthening as those Successor armies have a bit of everything in them, don't they.

These plastics have supplanted my El Cid plastic project for a few months. That's also because I'm having doubts about army composition, and I'm not sure I'm not just painting figures because I've got them. There's also the issue of needed to convert  figures to crossbow men, as the Hat boxes simply don't have enough.

Which then leaves me with Edgcote. This is a project to produce a 28mm game using Wargames Foundry figures. I have a big bag of them in the corner of the room.

These were given to the Northamptonshire Battlefields Society by WF in exchange for a few books, which is a good deal if you want a pile of 28mm Wars of the Roses figures.

Phil & I are painting them between us and we have a not fully defined timescale. That means I just pull packets out of the pile from time to time and do a batch of a dozen figures. Phil is doing the basing once we've sorted them all. However seem to need some cavalry, which we don't have at the moment.

This is a bit of an odd thing for me as I can't recall doing a joint project before, - at least not since I was 11 or 12, probably - and knowing I don't have full artistic control is a bit odd. Sometimes it is  liberating and sometimes it isn't. Normally for a project I set an end date, put my head down and go for it. I'm having to learn some new habits for this, which I think should be good for me.

Friday, 1 December 2017

A bit of a re-wOurcq-ing

I played this Op14 scenario over a year ago, and it proved quite nail biting. We did a number of things wrong when we played it, so it was good to give it another go.

The excuse was my monthly boardgame day with Gary. Op14 isn't a board game, but it looks a bit like one, and it shows how toy soldiers can solve some of the issues you can get with the traditional hex game.

I'd sent Gary the rules before hand and also a map with force deployments. The rules are a bit different for anyone brought up on SPI. There's an earlier version over in the downloads area if you want to see what I mean, although we were actually playing a more recent beta test set.

So this battle is sort of first/second day of the Marne. The day before, the 5th of September 1914, things had gone off a bit half cocked. Even so, the right hand end of von Kluck's army is still up in the air and if the French can seize the Trocy & Etavigny plateaus they can turn the line and roll up the German Army. The means to do this, of course, is a frontal assault up a hill against forces of roughly equal size.

What could possibly go wrong?

Gary took the Germans and I took the French, so we'll find out.

 Here we see 63rd Reserve Division and some of the 14th Div on their left, approaching the plateau, complete with masses of artillery.

On my right the Germans are bringing up 3rd Division, half of II Armeekorps, to bolster their left and hold the important bridge at Germingny. It is early in the day, and we're all rushing forwards to take the important towns and villages. The Germans of 3rd Division are already across the river and are moving forward in column to take the villages closer to my start line. The left hand end of their 22 Reserve Division was already deployed in line this side of the bridge overnight. The next turn will prove crucial as to who can get their attacks in before their opponents are fully ready.

On my left I've been forced to deploy by a German Cavalry division, which has now retired back across the river in the bottom left corner and dismounted. This is slowing my enveloping wing whilst the other half of II Armeekorps bundles down the road to plug the gap.

My Moroccans get to move early in the turn and are able to attack the Germans before they can deploy. I am able to bundle them out in some disorder, as is also the case with the unit to the immediate left.

In the centre it is less good. The Germans have the drop on me and have deployed their MGs and dug in.

Back on my right the Germans are going backwards, mostly. My attempt to push back everywhere has failed with the deployed unit, however, and I take 25% casualties. The problem for me now is that I've forced the Germans back to the best defensive lines, and they've now got field guns to bolster their line. They've got howitzers on the hill, and there are no river crossings in front of my Moroccans. I'll push the Huns back again and will wipe out a German brigade but I won't be able to exploit this position.

Now my left has stalled as the Uhlans have saddled up and are now trying to get into my rear. That means the German 4th Division of II Armeekorps has won the race to the edge of the plateau. In the middle, however, my Soixante Quinzes are doing a good number on the infantry deployed on the forward slope. Alas the whizz-bangs are keeping me pinned in the woods, so I can't exploit my good shooting.

So I've pushed the Germans back again at Germingny Bridge, but the prospect of crossing it is quite daunting.

Then I am able to exploit a bit of German tardiness and I get a brigade up on the Northern end of Trocy plateau (where the yellow dice are). My gunners have also inflicted massive casualties on the ridge defenders, with one brigade reduced to a single battalion (one base).

The Uhlans are taking their time, but they are working their way round my flank guard. I can't call off the attack to secure my rear. "En avant! Toujours en avant!".

Tomthe left of the central river I'm able to drive the Germans out of Acy village at bayonet point. I now have foot hold on both plateaus!

I'm afraid things aren't looking too good for my howitzer battery however.

Yes, I'm making good, solid progress all along the ridge line. My only worry is that I'll run out of daylight.

 On my right the Germans have retired behind the river. That playing card you can see means that the 3rd Division is on the point of exhaustion. I only need to inflict another casualty and they're bound to fail the test and fall apart. The high value tile here means that I move late in the turn, so unfortunately for me Gary is able to bring up and deploy some guns to strengthen his line .

Final turn and at last I'm in a position to attack Etrepilly. I've been shelling it with three batteries for several turns, and there's four hit markers on them. As my brave Frenchies storm into their position at least half of them turn into actual casualties, meaning Gary has a very slim chance of holding on. As it turns out neither of us can get a hit and I'm left at the bottom of the hill as night draws in.

This is where it ends. I've got a decent salient on the left hand end of my line. I've lost my howitzers, but the Uhlans are now a spent force. The centre of the German line is very weak, but I just ran out of time to exploit it. Gary is pointing to where he is explaining how he is going to put everything right.

Compared with history I think I did a little bit better, but not as well as I thought I would do at one point. It is a surprisingly well balanced scenario for one just plucked out of the pages of a book, and there's a lot to think about. There are no light weight decisions in the game.

Gary really enjoyed it, and is coming round to the idea that toy soldiers might be alright. So, a definite win, I should say.

Sunday, 26 November 2017

Russian about, but no delighted Turks

After the epic battle that was Ipsus, Chris put out a quick Russo-Turkish War scenario. We've played a few of these games, using Neil Thomas' 19th century rules. This was a scenario based on a real campaign in Kurdish Turkey, I think, (or was it Turkish Kurdy?) and was very confusing. In essence it boiled down to this. There's Russians in a town besieged by the Turks and a column is trying to rescue them. In the final scenario the length of time it takes to force the defile gives the number of turns to capture the town.

I played the Russians. Chris started with the Turks as Phil had to go off to visit a sick relative. He came back for the end.

I had infantry and guns and some dragoons.

The town was in another corner of the table

My guns were nice and shiny and bronze.

Having softened up the Turkish levy with devastating artillery fire I charged with my dragoons. What could possibly go wrong?

Losing the melee and being nearly wiped out, that's what. Curses.

Just as I was doing a super job of forcing the defile with my infantry some Turkish dragoons turned up. They launched a charge at my guns. What could possibly go wrong? Again?

Well, hardly inflicting any hits and being overrun. That's what could go wrong. And it did.

My infantry were doing great tho'. I am perfectly suited for Russian tactics. I can form column and march straight ahead. I'm good at that. I cleared that there defile good and proper.

Of course I still had that pesky horse in my rear.

And it was still a long march to the town.

But I'm claiming a win

These games are always a lot of fun. I've written elsewhere as to why I wouldn't use Neil's rules for this period every week, but every so often they really hit the spot.

Saturday, 25 November 2017

The "Lost" Lost Battle

Periodically I do these big refights using my 20mm plastics and the orbats from Phil Sabin's "Lost Battles". I don't use the Lost Battles rules, but usually AMW instead. Due to an unexpected convergence of events I was able to run another one this Friday.

I've always liked the Successor battles for these as they're really big and have all the cool stuff like elephants in them. I'd like to do a few more Roman games but alas I really need to beef up my Roman Republicans and allies a bit more before I return to the battles I haven't done from that era.

Trouble is I think I've done all the Successor battles in "Lost Battles" now. I could always do a repeat, but where's the fun in that? Luckily, however, I also have "Strategos", Sabin's first go at the LB system. That has a few more battles in it, including the mighty clash between Antigonus and his son against Seleucus and his boy plus some allies at Ipsus in 301BC.

This is a battle with a lot of elephants.

And probably scythe chariots.

There is a reason why it didn't make "Lost Battles", however. Although we have force sizes and some description of the action it is quite a confusing engagement and most accounts have to make stuff up in order for it to make sense. In fact, it is so tenuous that Phil Sabin probably just couldn't work out how to make it fit in LB. Or there simply wasn't enough evidence to justify trying.

That's not going to stop me, however. And this time I thought I'd use Basic Impetus instead of AMW. I'm a devil once I get going, aren't I?

Working from the Strategos listing and my books on Successor armies I put together the armies using the various Army Lists in BI. The Early Seleucid listing on its own doesn't have everything. For example there's no Scythe Chariots and you've got to have those, haven't you?

Any how I ended up with twp armies, about 20 units aside, with an army value of 44 for Seleuceus and his allies, and 42 for the Antigonds. The two lists are given at the end of the blog.

BTW This is a Red Letter Game. First time neither army was hiding some interlopers such as Assyrians or Celts to make up the numbers. This was as a result of a painting splurge on the bounty I uncovered at Hereward, which I discussed here: link, and the completion of my four boxes of Macedonian Elephants.

My fellow players and opponents for the day were Chris A, and Phil, who wasn't sure when he would get there. Chris, who had never played BI before, took the Allies and I took the Antigonids

The Allies are nearest the camera, with their big block of elephants in reserve clearly visible. The location of Seleucus' 400 war elephants during the battle is a matter for some debate. Reserves are very rare in Successor battles, but the few facts we have about the battle (and there are really not very many) imply they weren't out front. Or at least not all of them were.

Antigonus has to win big on the right, where he has a lot of Companion quality cavalry, under his son, Demetrious. The need here is to blow away the Seleucid cavalry, keep the horse archers out of the way and then find a way round the elephants to attack the phalanx.

On the left BI showed us its mercurial nature. Chris skirmished with my light horse with his horse archers. I charged him, he evaded, I declared a false charge, threw javelins at him and inflicted a hit. He failed the cohesion test with a 6 and his unit evaporated. Would have been better off standing his ground and fighting.

The centre was getting a bit messy. I shot at and hit the scythe chariots (see centre, - they have a Rummikub tile to show the revised Combat Value- "VBU" - of the unit) but they passed the cohesion test. On the left of my phalanx the Seleucid cavalry was threatening to envelope me, so I needed to turn a few units of hoplites to face.

In the centre the chariots ran over my light infantry speed bump, and rather than hit the elephants was found to be lined up to clip the phalangites.

At this point we had a slight rules issue. The BI rules say, in respect of Impetus:

The (Impetus) bonus is allowed for Mounted troops that charge any type of enemy except Elephants, Wagenburgs, Camels (see 2.2.3), and Foot with Pikes, Long spears or Polearms or protected by stakes or pavises.

Now, Scythe Chariots are Mounted, under the rules (as are elephants). This means they are denied Impetus when charging phalangites.

What?? They don't get impetus against the troop type they are designed to fight??? But they do get it against light troops, which are the type of troops you would use to defeat them????

This is a big deal, - the scythe chariot basic factor is 2 (against, for example, a poor quality phalangite unit on a 4), but their impetus bonus is 5. That would mean rolling 7 dice instead of 2 in the combat if you get impetus.

After a short discussion we decided that this rule was stupid, and ignored it.

Ouch. I rolled my black dice (there's one too many in the picture) and missed (you hit on a 6 or two 5's) Phil rolled his and got two hits.

My phalangites staggered back, but luckily survived the cohesion test, so were only disorded (the disorder markers are blue, so easy to spot). The chariots now hit my elephants as well.

On my right the cavalry closed. One of my four units is off the picture on the edge of the table, flitting around with some horse archers.

In the centre Chris went "all in", adding peltasts and his front line elephant to the mix. This elephant had already seen off my Thracian Peltasts, because, although it doesn't get impetus, neither do the peltasts and it has a higher VBU, which means it is more likely to pass the cohesion test..

I could accept neither getting it, just, but this is another odd piece of rule writing (luckily it is easily fixed, and will be for future games).

Anyway, many hits are inflicted, but everyone stands their ground. Even those blasted chariots.

Over on the right some poor initiative dice rolling and some ridiculous luck on cohesion tests mean the Seleucid left clings on, and instead of being driven back beyond the reach of the elephants just means I'm stuck right in front of their charge path.

At the other end of the table my flank guard cavalry are steadily loosing ground. Alas I don't have a pile of elephants to come to their aid.

Back in the centre it's all a bit mixed. I finally killed the pesky chariots, and drove back the elephants attacking my left. However the peltasts did a number on the centre of my phalanx which fell back. You'll note the peltasts are still fresh (no disorder, no damage) so I'm clearly stacking up a whole lot of trouble for the future.

Contrary to expectations my right wing cavalry doesn't crumble. Luckily those elephants only have a side charge, not a flank attack. I just get bounced back, which isn't such a big deal. Especially as I've got a shiny clean unit of cavalry enveloping the flank, at last.

As predicted the peltasts break through, taking out two units of (admittedly not very good) phalangites.

However, honours are almost even as I do succeed in breaking the elephant unit in the centre.

Now, clearly this is something you should never, ever, do. Charge into the back of a phalanx with completely fresh light cavalry. They are still denied impetus by the pikes (somethings don't apply if hit in the rear, like defensive fire, but denial of impetus isn't in that list), but with the die rolling probably wouldn't have made much difference. Still it is a bit odd, and could be easily fixed.

Anyway, having cleared all the Seleucid crud out of the middle it's tally ho and get stuck in with a will. I need to take the phalanx apart to win, as that's where I have another small advantage. And I have to do it quick, before the Seleucid elephants in reserve come to sort me out, along with their missile armed light cavalry.

On the right we've traded companion quality cavalry, but those elephants won't let me alone. Then Demetrious, the son of Antigonus, gets trampled.

The centre is going well, however, although those returning peltasts on the left of the picture are a problem.

Some stunning skill sees my elephants punch a big hole through the Seleucid line. I've even avoided the peltasts and got into the phalanx Chris was trying to flank me with.

You can see here that Chris and Phil are using the elephants for some fire fighting. I'm round the back with cavalry, and through the middle. The army points count puts us neck and neck.

A stunning piece of dice rolling - four sixes out of six dice destroy the elephants, having caught them from behind. Antiochus, Seluceus' son, goes down in the melee.

Too soon to celebrate, however, as on the other wing the hoplite unit with Antigonus is wiped out, and he dies too*. It's still pretty close, however. Both armies are at the 50% break point.

Next turn everything Chris touches turns to gold, and units start breaking. Although the point tally for victory isn't done until after I move I can't get any of my units in a position to kill anything.

Win for the Seleucids.

So, what do we think? Well, it might not look much like the historical battle, but then we know so little, it might do. Chris hasn't played BI before and wasn't enamoured of the catastrophic effect the cohesion test can have. I'm okay with it. There are problems with the rules, - I have pulled out a few of the most egregious issues as I've gone along - and in our case they are probably fixable. There are other ambiguities, - the drafting of the rules on wheeling are marvellously incomplete, for example. The basic rule reads as follows:

A Unit or Group can move or wheel. If not in Disorder, the Unit can wheel (first) and move (afterwards) for the rest of the move, but the Unit will be disordered at the end of the move.

So, can a unit in Disorder wheel? One for the rule book lawyers which could be easily avoided without resorting to sub-clauses.

Will we persist with them? Well, yes, probably, and I'm intending to take them to the Society of Ancients battle day. How much surgery will be needed is a matter for deep consideration.

But a very satisfactory way to pass most of a day.

*Antigonus did die at this battle. Only not like this.

Army Lists:

Number Type
1 Greek Hoplites FP  VBU=4  I=2  VD=2  Long spear
4 Astetairoi FP*  VBU=5  I=1  VD=3  Pike
1 Lykian  FP  VBU=4  I=2  VD=2  Long Spear
2 Pezetaioi FP*  VBU=4  I=1  VD=2  Pike
1 Thracian Peltasts FL  VBU=4  I=2  VD=2  Javelin
1 Persian Archers S  VBU=2  I=0  VD=1  Short bow B
1 Pamphylians S  VBU=2  I=0  VD=1  Javelin
4 Agema CP2*  VBU=6  I=3  VD=3
1 Persian Cavalry CM  VBU=4  I=2  VD=1
1 Thracians CL  VBU=4  I=1  VD=2  Javelin
1 EL  VBU=6  I=3  VD=3
Number Type
2 Greek Hoplites FP  VBU=4  I=2  VD=2  Long spear
3 Argyraspides FP* VBU=5  I=1  VD=3  Pike
2 Phalangites FP* VBU=4  I=1  VD=2  Pike
1 Asiatic Archers S VBU=2  I=0  VD=1  Short bow B
1 Cretans S VBU=3  I=0  VD=1  Short bow B
1 Greek javelins S VBU=2  I=0  VD=1  Javelin
1 Greek Peltasts FL VBU=4  I=1  VD=2  Javelin
2 Agema CP2* VBU=6  I=3  VD=3
1 Greeks CM VBU=4  I=2  VD=1
1 Greeks CM VBU=4  I=2  VD=1
2 Horse archers CL*  VBU=3  I=1  VD=1  Comp. bow
4 EL  VBU=6  I=3  VD=3
1 Scythed chariots CF VBU=2  I=5  VD=0